Flash Art uses cookies strictly necessary for the proper functioning of the website, for its legitimate interest to enhance your online experience and to enable or facilitate communication by electronic means. To learn more about cookies please see Terms & conditions

Flash Art
Flash Art
Shop
  • Home
    • CURRENT ISSUE
  • Features
    • Conversations
    • Reviews
    • Report
    • On View
    • FLASH FEED
    • Audacious Advice
    • Dance Office
    • Listening In
    • The Uncanny Valley
    • Flashback
    • (In)Visible Hands
    • PARADIGME
  • STUDIOS
    • Dune
    • Flash Art Mono
  • Archive
    • DIGITAL EDITION
    • Shop
    • Subscription
    • INSTITUTIONAL SUBSCRIPTION
    • Contact
→
Flash Art

339 SUMMER 2022, Reviews

21 June 2022, 9:00 am CET

Jackie Winsor MAMCO / Genève by Marilena Borriello

by Marilena Borriello June 21, 2022
1
2
3
4
5
Jackie Winsor. Exhibition view at MAMCO, Genève, 2022. Photography by Annik Wetter. Courtesy of MAMCO, Genève.
1
2
3
4
5
Jackie Winsor. Exhibition view at MAMCO, Genève, 2022. Photography by Annik Wetter. Courtesy of MAMCO, Genève.
1
2
3
4
5
Jackie Winsor, Closed Pyramid, 1987. Concrete pigment. 58,42 x 86,36 x 86,36 cm. Courtesy of Paula Cooper Gallery, New York. © Jackie Winsor.  
1
2
3
4
5
Jackie Winsor, Small Circle, 1969. Hemp. Ø 21.6 x 99 cm. Courtesy of Paula Cooper Gallery, New York. © Jackie Winsor.  
1
2
3
4
5
Jackie Winsor, Inset Wall Piece White with Red Interior, 1988-89. Acrylic altered cement and powdered pigment. 27,94 x 27,94 x 12,7 cm. Photography by Steven Probert. Courtesy of Paula Cooper Gallery, New York. © Jackie Winsor.  

When Michael Fried published his notorious essay “Art and Objecthood” (1967), he likely did not expect “theatricality” to become such a relevant concept in the aesthetic debates on experimental theater, visual art, and performance. Although the term was used to condemn minimalist sculpture for depending on the spectator’s presence, thus not being self- sufficient, Fried indirectly admitted that what constitutes the aesthetic value of an artwork is essentially the interrelational connection between the beholder and the art object.

MAMCO’s exhibition dedicated to Jackie Winsor, bringing together some of her most important works from the 1960s through the 2000s, evokes the American critic’s unintended lesson on aesthetics. Moving around the sculptures that the post-Minimalist artist executed through meticulous craftsmanship and research on material, shape, and process, the first impression is that they inhabit their space and confront spectators. As living bodies in a dormant state, these anthropomorphic presences radiate energy and ask for proximity. They invite the viewer to approach and linger on their story — to perceive the time and work needed for their completion. Temporality is, thus, an intrinsic property of these objects, since the duration of perception corresponds to the time of realization of the work. The viewer’s object of attention is not the form per se but what is within it, the processual condition and variable circumstances that led to the sculpture’s fulfilment.

Rope Trick (1968), Dark Vertical Cylinder (1969), Double Bound Circle (1971), Rope Arch (1968), and Bound Grid (1971–72) are the sculptures on display that most suggest this sense of presence and aesthetic interaction between the work and the viewer. They are some of the iconic works that Winsor realized from 1967 to 1971 in her studio on Mulberry Street in Lower Manhattan, using heavy secondhand rope, first covered with resin, then wound around itself. In Dark Vertical Cylinder, the thick maritime rope twisted upright becomes a totemic cylindrical body. The human scale — about two meters tall and thirty centimeters in diameter — and the plasticity of the rope’s ridges lend the work an anthropomorphic appearance. But beyond its mighty aspect, the object imposes itself as a performative remnant: by following the irregularities of this very long thread that defies gravity, the viewer’s gaze reenacts the movements, the sound of the rope moving on the floor, the artist’s labored breathing while grappling with the thick cord’s physicality.

1
2
3
4
5
Jackie Winsor, Pink and Blue Piece, 1985. Mirror, wood, paint, and cheesecloth. 78,7 x 78,7 x 78,7 cm. Photography by Steven Probert. Courtesy of Paula Cooper Gallery, New York. © Jackie Winsor.  
1
2
3
4
5
Jackie Winsor, Rope Arch, 1967-68. Hemp rope and steel rod. 215,9 x 30,5 x 15,2 cm. Courtesy of Paula Cooper Gallery, New York. © Jackie Winsor.  
1
2
3
4
5
Jackie Winsor, Rope Trick, 1967-68. Hemp with steel rod. 188 in height, Ø 22,8 cm. Photography by Steven Probert. Courtesy of Paula Cooper Gallery, New York. © Jackie Winsor.  
1
2
3
4
5
Jackie Winsor, Solid Lattice, 1974. Wood and nails. 68,6 x 61 x 55,9 cm. Photography by Steven Probert. Courtesy of Paula Cooper Gallery, New York. © Jackie Winsor.  
1
2
3
4
5
Jackie Winsor, Black and White Inset Wall Piece, 5 Lines With Black Interior, 1992. Acrylic altered cement and powdered pigment. 46,03 x 46,03 x 9,8 cm. Courtesy of Paula Cooper Gallery, New York. © Jackie Winsor.  

For Winsor, the act of realizing a sculpture is no different from the making of a performance. Indeed, her laborious, repetitive, task-oriented methods are similar to Yvonne Rainer’s radical approach to image-making through improvisation and everyday actions. Winsor not only saw all of Rainer’s performances, but also felt a particular affinity for her revolutionary method of energy distribution. Indeed, the dancer’s influence is perceptible in how Winsor’s sculptures are choreographed in space. Although they are all self-contained objects, independent from each other, a dynamic tension arises from their spatial arrangement. The spin movement of Solid Lattice (1970) is mitigated by the gridded network of tree branches of Bound Grid (1972). On the other hand, Pink and Blue Piece (1985) almost disappears as its mirrored sides — each with a small square opening in its center — reflect the surrounding environment, the other objects in the space, and the viewer. This interplay of opposing but complementary forces is exemplified by the “Inset Wall Pieces” that the artist began in 1998. These objects, oscillating between paintings and sculptures, invite the viewer’s gaze to go beyond the layers of paint, wood, or cast concrete and penetrate their dense, optically pulsating centers.

These sculptures show Winsor’s relentless search for an interactive dialogue between the work of art and the viewing process. They prove that Fried was right, despite his overall negative evaluation: an object becomes aesthetic through the process of experience; the viewer’s gaze extends the artwork’s material configuration, going beyond simple physical matter.

Share this article
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Mail
More stories by

Marilena Borriello

When Your Smile Is So Wide and Your Heels Are So High: The Paintings of Louisa Gagliardi

14 June 2022, 9:00 am CET

My father recently told me how he often walks around the house opening doors and gazing into empty rooms. He…

Read More

Tishan Hsu: Body Currents

6 July 2022, 9:00 am CET

As of late, “prescient” has become the preferred modifier for artist, Tishan Hsu. Indeed, as framed by the recent retrospective…

Read More

Misaligned Identities: Raphaela Vogel

10 June 2022, 9:00 am CET

When I think back on 2018 there is always something that feels misaligned — a disconnect between myself and the…

Read More

Beyond the Limits of Empirical Knowledge: Marguerite Humeau’s New Way of Thinking and Making

12 July 2022, 9:00 am CET

Some might consider Marguerite Humeau’s artistic trajectory unconventional. Coming to art via design, she first studied textile design in France,…

Read More

  • Next

    Charles Ray Centre Pompidou and Pinault Collection – Bourse de Commerce / Paris

  • Previous

    Berenice Olmedo: The Myth of Autonomy

© 2023 Flash Art

  • Terms & conditions
  • Contact
  • Work with Us