Flash Art uses cookies strictly necessary for the proper functioning of the website, for its legitimate interest to enhance your online experience and to enable or facilitate communication by electronic means. To learn more about cookies please see Terms & conditions

Flash Art
Flash Art
Shop
  • Home
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • Features
    • Archive
    • Conversations
    • FOCUS ON
    • On View
    • PARADIGME
    • Reviews
    • Report
    • Studio Scene
    • The Curist
    • Unpack / Reveal / Unleash
  • STUDIOS
    • Dune
    • Flash Art Mono
    • Archive
      • DIGITAL EDITION
      • Shop
      • Subscription
      • INSTITUTIONAL SUBSCRIPTION
      • Contact
→
Flash Art

338 SPRING 2022, Reviews

29 March 2022, 9:00 am CET

Caroline Kent “Chicago Works” Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago by Matt Morris

by Matt Morris March 29, 2022
1
2
3
4
5
Caroline Kent, “Chicago Works.” Exhibition view at MCA – Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago, 2021-22. Photography by Nathan Keay. Courtesy of MCA – Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago.
1
2
3
4
5
Caroline Kent, “Chicago Works.” Exhibition view at MCA – Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago, 2021-22. Photography by Nathan Keay. Courtesy of MCA – Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago.
1
2
3
4
5
Caroline Kent, “Chicago Works.” Exhibition view at MCA – Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago, 2021-22. Photography by Nathan Keay. Courtesy of MCA – Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago.
1
2
3
4
5
Caroline Kent, “Chicago Works.” Exhibition view at MCA – Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago, 2021-22. Photography by Nathan Keay. Courtesy of MCA – Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago.
1
2
3
4
5
Caroline Kent, “Chicago Works.” Exhibition view at MCA – Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago, 2021-22. Photography by Nathan Keay. Courtesy of MCA – Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago.

Caroline Kent’s installation at the MCA Chicago comprises two dimly lit spaces dressed to evoke studies: one space includes an open writing desk credited as a collaboration with the artist’s husband Nate Young, while the other is characterized by shelves of bound volumes with abstract, geometric paintings on their covers and spines. A correspondence in every sense of the word is suggested by enigmatic clues and easy-to-miss details that often mirror and echo the arrangements of the adjoining gallery. A lively synthesis of noir, sci-fi, domestic, and futuristic sensibilities elicits associations to the outlandish narratives around which “escape room” entertainments are organized or the intrigue of puzzle-based video games presented in surreal, otherworldly settings. Immersive décor in suggestive shades of green bridge allusions to nature and artifice — one could be called “hunter” green, while another bears the sticky intensity of arsenic dyes from the nineteenth century. These flatly verdant infernal offices are presented as spaces of analysis; even the miniature concrete Silent Sentinel sculptures (all works 2021) resemble the ethnographic tchotchke that crowded Sigmund Freud’s London offices.

And surely what Kent proposes in her selection of new work on 3,4 view is precisely an analysis — one that traverses the linguistic, the corporeal, and the epistemological tethers by which language and bodies often occur as coextensive in contemporary life. That is, Kent’s process of abstraction combines hieroglyphic flatness in allusions to figures with protean alphabets in meltdown. The writing and reading to which these rooms are intended deal in oblique encoded communications that substitute the embodied speech act.

The moody theater of these installation environments contextualizes a series of unstretched scroll paintings with black grounds and tangles of flatly painted shapes and glyphs in the manner for which Kent has been celebrated for several years. The layered, dynamic compositions serve to demonstrate that abstraction operates as an ever-expanding project of language, whose complex grammar has been developed across global cultures, historical periods, and navigations of regulated identities. We gather across time features forms in poison green and tinted orange that interlock as cleverly as well-kerned typography. Mostly Kent’s nuanced écriture lacks translation, which is advantageous in order to observe the mechanics of how language operates — strung together into thought, practiced into eloquence, repeated into ideology — rather than contending with a particular literary content.

1
2
3
4
5
Caroline Kent, “Chicago Works.” Exhibition view at MCA – Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago, 2021-22. Photography by Nathan Keay. Courtesy of MCA – Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago.
1
2
3
4
5
Caroline Kent, “Chicago Works.” Exhibition view at MCA – Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago, 2021-22. Photography by Nathan Keay. Courtesy of MCA – Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago.
1
2
3
4
5
Caroline Kent, “Chicago Works.” Exhibition view at MCA – Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago, 2021-22. Photography by Nathan Keay. Courtesy of MCA – Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago.
1
2
3
4
5
Caroline Kent, “Chicago Works.” Exhibition view at MCA – Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago, 2021-22. Photography by Nathan Keay. Courtesy of MCA – Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago.
1
2
3
4
5
Caroline Kent, “Chicago Works.” Exhibition view at MCA – Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago, 2021-22. Photography by Nathan Keay. Courtesy of MCA – Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago.

One clue Kent reveals, via wall text, to be an organizing principle in the work is a fanciful narrative about telepathic twin sisters that informs her decisions. And yet these characters are scarcely represented in any visual way within the exhibition. Perhaps the network of artificial plants that double as speakers and emit a gently crackling soundtrack — each is titled Untitled (Frequency) — indicates their psychic communiqués. A large nearby canvas roiling with gray-scale shadows and titled A scheme on how to stave off desire with distraction, acrylic on unstretched canvas, brought to mind the perverse longings of the sisters in Jean Genet’s The Maids (1947); it may be that Victoria and Veronica (as Kent has dubbed them) are mischievous at least, and perhaps dangerous to the symbolic orders that preside over the developed world.

Kent focuses on the internal logics of linguistics that precede the production of meaning in order to reckon structurally with the ways value systems are established, thus better illuminating the justifications around the lives, jobs, genders, and interior psychologies that are made to matter within those systems. In a sense her paintings are protest signs — not in direct response to one or another political agenda, but an interrogation of a prior state from which the articulations of such politics proceed.

Share this article
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Mail
More stories by

Matt Morris

Metro Pictures (1980-2021). Expressionism embarrasses me. A conversation with Janelle Reiring and Helene Winer

6 April 2022, 9:00 am CET

Originally published in Flash Art International no. 133, April 1987. I met Helene Winer when she was still at Artists…

Read More

Xinyi Cheng’s Intimate Assault on Reality

23 March 2022, 9:00 am CET

From the clutter of urban life, Xinyi Cheng subtracts transient moments of respite. Her subjects, alone or in pairs, mostly…

Read More

Catalina Ouyang: Perilous Embodiment

16 March 2022, 9:00 am CET

It’s easy to be led to the abyss. — Cixin Liu Catalina Ouyang sees their multimedia practice — an amalgam…

Read More

Space As a Reflection Of the Mind

10 March 2022, 9:00 am CET

Olivia Erlanger: I’ve been really interested in the psychology of interiors and the way that space can act as a…

Read More

  • Next

    Metro Pictures (1980-2021). Expressionism embarrasses me. A conversation with Janelle Reiring and Helene Winer

  • Previous

    “The Real Show” CAC Brétigny

© 2025 Flash Art

  • Terms & conditions
  • Contact
  • Work with Us