Flash Art uses cookies strictly necessary for the proper functioning of the website, for its legitimate interest to enhance your online experience and to enable or facilitate communication by electronic means. To learn more about cookies please see Terms & conditions

Flash Art
Flash Art
Shop
  • Home
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • Features
    • Archive
    • Conversations
    • FOCUS ON
    • On View
    • PARADIGME
    • Reviews
    • Report
    • Studio Scene
    • The Curist
    • Unpack / Reveal / Unleash
  • STUDIOS
    • Dune
    • Flash Art Mono
    • Archive
      • DIGITAL EDITION
      • Shop
      • Subscription
      • INSTITUTIONAL SUBSCRIPTION
      • Contact
→
Flash Art

#323 Nov 2018–Jan 2019, Features

10 November 2018, 8:00 am CET

Portrait of the Artist as a Young Feminist: On Judy Chicago by Géraldine Gourbe

by Géraldine Gourbe November 10, 2018
1
2
3
Judy Chicago, Immolation from Women and Smoke, 1972. Fireworks performance. Photography courtesy of Through the Flower Archives. Performed in the California Desert, 1972. Courtesy and ©Judy Chicago/Artists Rights Society, New York.
1
2
3
Judy Chicago, Immolation from Women and Smoke, 1972. Fireworks performance. Photography courtesy of Through the Flower Archives. Performed in the California Desert, 1972. Courtesy and ©Judy Chicago/Artists Rights Society, New York.
1
2
3
Smoke Gun Atmosphere, 1968. Performance. Photography courtesy of Through the Flower Archives. Performed at Brookside Park, Pasadena, California, 1968. Courtesy and © Judy Chicago/Artists Rights Society, New York.

Judy Chicago had been Judy Chicago for five years when she published her autobiography Through the Flower: My Struggle as a Woman Artist. The artist previously known as Judy Gerowitz had made her first appearance in 1970 in the advertising pages of Artforum, wearing a bandana, close-cropped brown hair, and an insolently perched pair of round sunglasses. A month after this media breakthrough she was in Artforum again, this time triumphantly sporting her new name on a white sweatshirt in a boxing ring. Thus she gave birth to a character who was initially just a figment but whose power of self-assertion was already having an impact.
Her political commitment might have been explicitly radical, but Chicago chose to pursue it via her own milieu — the art world. Her participation in the group show “Primary Structures: Younger American and British Sculptors” at the Jewish Museum in 1966 had earned her a reputation as a Minimalist, a label that meant she could promote her portrait of the young artist as feminist to a specific end: to challenge her peers and colleagues. Her way of doing this was to appropriate the codes of Pop art and repurpose them, while maintaining the Minimalist/Conceptualist anticapitalist critique of the Pop ethos. The badass portrait she invented was intended as a break with the cool image of a mass-media icon. At the same time, the art magazine as such was exploited as a medium in its most obvious commercial aspects — especially in the age of art’s dematerialization — and thus subverted and occupied.
In fact this new persona followed in the wake of the macha, the feminine macho persona Chicago had deliberately adopted during the 1960s as a way of getting the recognition of her peers, the so-called “studs” who formed a community around Los Angeles’s Ferus Gallery.
At the junction of the critique of the art object and new social paradigms, Judy Chicago was born.

Sexual Phenomenology and the Dematerialization of Art
The tactical and narrative transition from Gerowitz to Chicago took place at the same time as her first solo exhibition, at California State University, Fullerton. In addition to the Artforum ads, the show included works from the “Atmospheres” series (1968–), pyrotechnic performances celebrating the multiorgasmic power of the goddess figure. Curves symbolizing political fertility were part of the “Domes” series (1965–) — small, glossy, pastel-colored objects of expanded polyurethane — and their painterly transposition, the “Pasadena Lifesavers” (1969). Eight years after her early attempts with Mother Superette (1963), this series of paintings inaugurated the chromatic experiments of the “central core imagery” she had initially spotted and analyzed in the work of Lee Bontecou, Emily Carr, Jay DeFeo, Barbara Hepworth, Louise Nevelson, Georgia O’Keeffe, Deborah Remington, and Miriam Schapiro.

1
2
3
Trinity, 1965. Latex paint on canvas-covered plywood. 64 × 127 × 60 in. Photography courtesy of Through the Flower Archives. Collection of Glenn Schaeffer. © Judy Chicago /Artists Rights Society, New York.
1
2
3
Zig Zag, 1965. (destroyed). Acrylic on canvas-covered plywood. 240 × 72 in. Photography courtesy of Through the Flower Archives. Courtesy and © Judy Chicago/ Artists Rights Society, New York.
1
2
3
Place setting from The Dinner Party, 1979. Mixed media. Photography © Donald Woodman /Artists Rights Society, New York. Collection of Brooklyn Museum, gift of the Elizabeth A Sackler Foundation. © Judy Chicago /Artists Rights Society, New York.

This vaginal evocation was born of an urge to share. Central core imagery became the principal vector of a revolution that was not feminine (a nuance that received a mixed reception from British Constructivist feminists) but sexual: for and by women. Writing about the “Pasadena Lifesavers” with regard to this revolution, Chicago said, “They embodied all the work I had been doing in the past year, reflecting the range of my own sexuality and identity.”1 As she saw it, emancipation from a patriarchal tradition would take place through the achievement of a fullness of enjoyment — in the dual sense of hedonistic pleasure and usufruct — that correlates with the development of one’s artistic maturity.
She found the justification for writing her autobiography in the erotic diaries of Anaïs Nin. The initiatory quest of Through the Flower follows Nin stylistically, but takes on a more personal cast when the author describes her gut interest in another — visual rather than literary — erotic culture: “I was interested in dissolving sensation, like one experiences in orgasm.”2
This entirely new undertaking consisted of a critical sublimation of the strategy of pornography. Sexuality is bluntly proclaimed — this is “cunt art” — while remaining pictorially oblique. This subtlety was misapprehended by the inheritors of a Lacanianism unsympathetic to any notion of polymorphous pleasure. Moreover, the Marxist feminists Mary Kelly and Griselda Pollock failed to take into account Chicago’s role in the dematerialization of art on the West Coast. This excessively literalist riposte on the part of these feminists misses the point: the auratic image of an intense sensation that is dematerializing.
Chicago is fully aware of the importance of sex as a political object, and of the need to transcend purely artistic goals. The badass persona’s I becomes an active force for us.

1
2
Birth Hood, 1965-2011. Sprayed automotive lacquer on car hood. 42.9 × 42.9 × 4.3 in. Photography © Donald Woodman /Artists Rights Society, New York. Courtesy of the artist; Salon 94, New York; and Jessica Silverman Gallery, San Francisco. © Judy Chicago /Artists Rights Society, New York.
1
2
Mother Superette, 1964. Acrylic on paper. 19 ½ × 26 in. Photography © Donald Woodman /Artists Rights Society, New York. Collection of Elizabeth A. Sackler. © Judy Chicago /Artists Rights Society, New York.

 

Knowledge and Pleasure
As soon as it appeared in translation in 1954, Simone de Beauvoir’s Second Sex met with resounding success on America’s campuses. The French philosopher’s rallying cry resonated with the new transatlantic aspirations: being a woman is a given of one’s history, not an explanation. The aim here was not so much to ensure the liberation of woman as to trigger collective thinking about women as a historical category. However, the development of this new knowledge could not happen without consideration of another given: pleasure. Aimed at shaking off moral and religious control of social mores, the first demands of the women’s liberation movement focused on free access to contraception and abortion, which immediately paved the way for unprecedented experimentation relating to the body. In this context building up an archive made possible the historical deconstruction of the privileges governing pleasure and the unrestricted imagining of a brighter future. United under the Women’s Liberation banner, the “people without a past” of the French feminist anthem realized they had set the stage for a new era of revolution.

1
Queen Victoria from the Great Ladies series, 1973. Sprayed acrylic on canvas. 40 × 40 in. Photography © Donald Woodman /Artists Rights Society, New York. Collection of Elizabeth A. Sackler. © Judy Chicago / Artists Rights Society, New York.

Marked by this paradigmatic shift, Chicago’s break with her previous work eluded art critics, who in spite of everything continued to see it as part of the L.A. Finish Fetish movement. Thoroughly aware of the yawning gap between her artistic ambitions and its public reception, she came up with a project for a community devoted to the emergence of a new visual culture: the first year of a new way of seeing could only be instigated collectively. Thus was Womanhouse (1971–72) created, followed by the Woman’s Building (1973–91). Womanhouse’s opening exhibition and subsequent performances entered the art canon, but insufficient attention has been paid to the important archival work put in by the history-makers involved. Members of the Womanhouse community — in many cases artists or students — dug deep, delving into old files, libraries, and secondhand bookshops in search of a buried past, bringing their findings together in a database that would become the source for anthologies to come and would later form the structure of an education program for a public audience. Thanks to Chicago’s visionary capacity, this new history of art was complemented by a skills cooperative, an indispensable factor in ensuring independent distribution. The fertile compost of radical teaching would activate the different stages of this cultural revolution.
Chicago’s commitment to historiography, the driving force behind the shaping of a herstory that was a particularly rich source of collaborative impetus, changed her approach to painting. Her series “The Great Lady” (1972–73), a new, hypnotic variation on cunt art, included a mass of handwritten notes. This stage completed, she left the Woman’s Building and its host of activities to devote herself to the creation of a monumental history of pleasure by and for women: The Dinner Party (1974–79), a work confronting the ongoing erasure of women’s contributions to culture.

GÉRALDINE GOURBE is a professor, researcher, and philosopher. She holds a PhD in philosophy, specializing in queer and postcolonial theory, and in Californian art since the 1960s. She curated “Judy Chicago. Los Angeles, les années cool,” a monographic and collective exhibition at the Villa Arson Art Center in Nice, 2018.

Through the Flower is a clear-sighted documentation of Chicago’s metamorphosis. In it we are present at the birth of a paper tigress who became the embodiment of a critical, vigilant witnessing of history. Her narrative protects us against the worn-out doxa of the history of women artists and the perennial belief in their salvation through political art. It unflaggingly insists not only on the history of the forgotten, but more importantly how the histories and narratives of the forgotten modify the way we write history.
This text has been translated and adapted from the preface to the French edition of Through The Flower: My Struggle as a Woman Artist, published by Les Presses du Réel to mark the exhibition “Los Angeles, les Années Cool: Judy Chicago” at the Villa Arson Art Center in Nice, 2018.

1 Judy Chicago, “Making a Professional Life and an Equalized Relationship,” in Through The Flower, p. 56.
2 Ibid., p. 55.

Share this article
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Mail
More stories by

Géraldine Gourbe

Tiana Reid on Landscape and the Figural in the Sculptures of Tau Lewis

13 January 2019, 9:31 am CET

If you Google image “figural,” you’ll see thousands of images of Disney keyring dolls, mostly made of foam. Since abandoning…

Read More

Plunging into the Void: Judy Chicago’s Images

28 November 2018, 8:00 am CET

I first saw Judy Chicago’s Birth Trinity (1983) and Birth Tear/Tear (1982) when visiting the artist’s studio in Belen, New…

Read More

Antek Walczak. Planned Obsolescence?

14 November 2018, 4:39 pm CET

Antek Walczak advances the medium of painting as a kind of machine through which social, economic, political, and technological systems…

Read More

Cauleen Smith: The Art of Giving

13 January 2019, 8:43 am CET

Fanta Sylla: Ever since the publication of Maggie Nelson’s The Art of Cruelty: A Reckoning in 2011, I have yearned…

Read More

  • Next

    Antek Walczak. Planned Obsolescence?

  • Previous

    Narrative Excess: Judy Chicago’s Work in Text

© 2025 Flash Art

  • Terms & conditions
  • Contact
  • Work with Us